An Orange county man and his wife were married for 18 years until their divorce in 2004. During this time, they owned and managed a real estate company together. 18 years and 2 children later, the husband has accepted his former wife as a lesbian, and that she was moving in with her new lover.
In the process of the divorce, he agreed to pay $1,250 per month in alimony. She did not, however, reveal that she and her new lover were now registered as domestic partners.
Should this man still have to pay alimony?
Is this a case of the wife wanting her $1,250 per month cake and GETTING to eat it, too?
Do you think it has an impact on the gay rights/marriage issues when a person enters a same-sex relationship while still reaping rewards of their marriage?
Regards,
Rock E. Horror
kayer_fire: So, you stance is that as long as congress is against gay marriage, the husband (in this case) should have to be financially held accountable for their decision, even though HE IS accepting of his ex- wife’s new relationship?
This took place in Orange County here in Southern California; one of the few states to recognize same-sex relationships on ANY level.
LOL… No. I’m not the husband.
Image taken on by .
Mail this post
Technorati Tags: alimony, domestic, lesbian, Partnership, registered, she's, Should, still, Wife